The facts are something like this: 1- Amazon owns servers and serves the client-interface ot interact with their servers. 2- They make public their Terms of Se

The facts are something like this: 1- Amazon owns servers and serves the client-interface ot interact with their servers. 2- They make public their Terms of Service and they make users (with accounts) agree to them. 3- The terms include a (very standard) "you can only use our service through the interface you provide, you may not automate this interface" clause. 4- Users violate this clause when they use an agent and browser-use. 5- Perplexity provided browser-use features that were used, by design, for users to break this clause. From those facts, as shown to you, do you think Amazon doesn't have a case?