3 ms·

Sure, ok. Why would nVidia, then, do what TFA is describing?

• hnuser123456 11d ago
  If HF holds OAI accountable to pay for "rogue" agent behavior, the rest of the business world will be more afraid of adopting AI, which will reduce demand for Nvidia GPUs, possibly at a long-term cost to Nvidia much greater than $100M. Whether or not a human is putting in any effort to ensure the safeguards are enabled and working should be the million dollar question. And even more expensive if the safeguards were deliberately disabled for a "our AI is so smart we can't contain it" marketing piece.
  • moralestapia 10d ago
    Does that effect only exist if nVidia is the suing party?
    • hnuser123456 10d ago
      No, it would be an indirect market effect.
      • moralestapia 10d ago
        Then why would nVidia acquire such company?
        • hnuser123456 5d ago
          To prevent HF from arguing for additional regulation.