3 ms·
Do you mean "Irregular was not involved (we know for certain)" or "Irregular was not involved (as far as we know)"?
by hungryhobbit 2mo ago
Do you mean "Irregular was not involved (we know for certain)" or "Irregular was not involved (as far as we know)"?
- ameliaquining 2mo agoWe know for certain. The involvement of Irregular in the other cases was never a secret, they were quite open about what they were working on and the results of the evaluations were being published on their website.
- 0xy 2mo agoTheir disclosures in other cases is not evidence of non-involvement in this case.
- ameliaquining 2mo agoCan you explain in what way you think they could possibly have been covertly involved?
- aesthesia 2mo agoThere's very little reason to believe Irregular was involved in that incident, and the article presents no evidence to that effect. So it's "There's not a teapot orbiting the sun somewhere between Earth and Mars (as far as we know)."
- yorwba 2mo agoOpenAI explicitly stated those were separate incidents: https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/ https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-invol...
- EA-3167 2mo agoIf you want to believe without evidence why bother to read articles? Faith doesn’t require that, but if you’re serious then a lack of evidence is important.