3 ms·
This is vibe coded I guess? Toggling the "Happiness plateau line" does nothing.
by thr0w 19d ago
This is vibe coded I guess? Toggling the "Happiness plateau line" does nothing.
- deleted 19d ago[deleted]
- gruez 19d ago>Made by Patrick Glenn by way of Claude and ChatGPT. Code under the MIT License; text and charts under CC BY 4.0.
- addaon 19d ago> Code under the MIT License If the code is written by an LLM, then it can't be copyrighted, and a license can't be applied.
- pbasista 19d agoWhy do you believe that?
- mminer237 19d agoIt's a basic principle of copyright that only a natural person can be an author. The US Copyright Office has stated such: https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Copyrightability-Report.pdf https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intell... The Council of the EU has also stated such AFAIK.
- addaon 19d agoThe author is a tool, not a person. Tools cannot hold copyright. Copyright requires human authorship. Licenses depend on copyright as their essential mechanism.
- joquarky 18d agoA camera is a tool.
- pbasista 18d agoExactly. The person holding the camera is the author. Even if they just point the camera and press the record button. In a similar way, I would not consider AI to be the "author" of the output they produce. Rather, the person prompting it should be considered the author, in my opinion.
- pwmglenn 19d agofixed.