3 ms·
Did you read the article? What do you think of the contents of it other than the headline?
by muratmutlu 14y ago
Did you read the article? What do you think of the contents of it other than the headline?
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- cryptoz 14y agoYes, I have read it now. It was a nice article. I did not find out that everything I know about fitness was a lie. I found out that I don't know much, but what I did know was correct (and I learned a number of new things). No reason to hide a nice article behind a rude, condescending and incorrect headline.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- bcoates 14y agoThe word "You" in a headline is an idiom and not literally a personal communication to the reader. "Lie" is used similarly.
- magicproudfeet 14y ago> a miasma of lies and misinformation that we mistake for common sense, and that makes most of our gym time a complete waste Well, it started off with complete bullshit like this. If we could get 10% of people to the gym (instead of their usual home-bound sugar-feast), it would be fucking wonderful. My gym time was never a waste, regardless of my form or which equipment I was using. The rest of the article, however, I'm pretty in line with with. But it's preaching to the choir for the most part. We could make this article mandatory reading and it wouldn't make a goddamn difference. And that's the problem. Got a solution? You'd get the Nobel Prize in EVERYTHING if you could figure out an effective way to get masses of people to effect these kinds of changes in their lives. That kind of science spans the realms of pyschology, sociology, medicine, biology, physics, and wizardry.