4 ms·
Can you show me one long-form investigative article from, let's say before 2020, that is nearly this dense with this BS? A single headline or a punchline here o
by applfanboysbgon 11d ago
Can you show me one long-form investigative article from, let's say before 2020, that is nearly this dense with this BS? A single headline or a punchline here or there doesn't count; what makes it an LLM tell is that it's fucking constant, being abused and misused to add dramatic tension to things that aren't dramatic. The "humans do this too" defense is so tiring because you people never draw a distinction between a human doing something correctly as a rhetorical flourish and a bot spamming a learned trope over and over and over and over again in every single sentence without any regard for whether it makes sense to.
- WesolyKubeczek 11d agoOr, maybe, people have skill issues?
- applfanboysbgon 11d agoA class of skill issues that never manifested a few years ago but which now manifest 30 times a day on the front page of HN. Riiiiight.
- avazhi 10d agoHard to say what you're trying to get at here - are you saying people are shit writers and thus write in a shitty, LLM-sounding way, or that people are shitty writers and use LLMs to do the writing for them. The latter is pretty inexcusable intellectually and disrespectful of people who will read the slop, and as the other guy said, it's incomprehensible (to everybody but you apparently) that shit writing would suddenly, in just the last few years and entirely by coincidence, mirror the shit writing shat out by LLMs.
- WesolyKubeczek 10d ago> as the other guy said, it's incomprehensible (to everybody but you apparently) also a skill issue