2 ms·

So you’re saying the CFAA should not require any intent to break the law, only the outcome? Are we really saying the Aaron Swartz prosecution was actually corre

by brookst 21d ago

So you’re saying the CFAA should not require any intent to break the law, only the outcome? Are we really saying the Aaron Swartz prosecution was actually correct, after all these years?

bonzini 21d ago
No, but surely it's negligent to let an agent run unsupervised and without guardrails for days while at the same time bragging about AI carrying a potential extinction risk?
- true_religion 20d ago
  It might even be grossly negligent to do that.
  - brookst 20d ago
    So we’re back to civil rather than criminal law?
    - bonzini 18d ago
      Sometimes negligence is enough for criminal law too. I don't know the details of the CFAA.