4 ms·

What is "the new one"? The old one used AI, and this one seems to as well.

• arnemunthekaas 11d ago
  Author here: It doesn't, well at least not art-wise. All sources are attributed in https://github.com/arnegiacomo/fugleramme/blob/main/assets/artwork/classic/manifest.json https://github.com/arnegiacomo/fugleramme/blob/main/assets/a... and https://github.com/arnegiacomo/fugleramme/blob/main/assets/artwork/classic/ATTRIBUTION.md https://github.com/arnegiacomo/fugleramme/blob/main/assets/a...
  • coinfused 11d ago
    This is much appreciated! Thanks for making this decision
• stetrain 11d ago
  From the link: "Half the point of this project is showing off some amazing public-domain natural-history illustrations. Over 800 cut-outs covering more than 400 species, every one taken from a real plate and hand-curated for this project (no art is AI-generated, though some has been retouched with AI)."
  • xgulfie 11d ago
    Idk what "retouched with AI" means. Does it mean they used a segmentation model to cut out the shapes, or were they shoved through an imagegen and completely recreated?
    • dzhiurgis 9d ago
      At this point - does it even matter? AI photos are indistinguishable.
      • xgulfie 9d ago
        It matters to me because it claims to be "real, hand-cut 1800s bird illustrations" which is the whole appeal of this to me