4 ms·
I'd like to see evidence which supports the claims and not have to rely on a call to authority fallacy[1] in order to agree with this collective-derived reality
by aa-jv 20d ago
I'd like to see evidence which supports the claims and not have to rely on a call to authority fallacy[1] in order to agree with this collective-derived reality.
I have no doubt that there are weapons in space - Russian, Chinese, American - why wouldn't there be? - but I still want to see actual evidence.
None of the sources you give are impartial - all of them serve to profit from perpetuating fear of Chinese space activities.
Too often, xenophobic movements rely on authority figures to perpetuate their myths. Don't you agree?
[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
- voidUpdate 20d agoWhat evidence would satisfy you that there are weapons in space? You either have to check yourself somehow, or trust a third party. Is there a third party you trust to provide evidence?
- aa-jv 20d agoThe article from The Space Review comes pretty close to providing some actual evidence. There are no trustworthy third parties when it comes to xenophobic agitprop.
- voidUpdate 20d agoWhat extra would you want from the space review article that would constitute actual evidence for you?
- gowld 19d agoSpace Review website has malware-download ads all over the page. That spooks me.
- scottyah 20d agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TP-82 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TP-82