3 ms·
tbf many human devs I've worked with don't think about n+1 and similar issues and need constant reminders. overall software quality seems largely unchanged
by jappgar 20d ago
tbf many human devs I've worked with don't think about n+1 and similar issues and need constant reminders.
overall software quality seems largely unchanged
- unclebucknasty 19d ago>tbf many human devs I've worked with don't... OTOH, if someone insists on writing bad code—even after being advised otherwise—then they should expect to be out of a job. Doesn't seem like "terminated junior developer" is the level of quality we should be accepting or promoting for AI.
- jappgar 19d agothat doesn't actually happen though. If you fired every dev with sloppy code you wouldn't be left with much.
- unclebucknasty 18d agoYou previously asserted that devs repeatedly ignored specific code quality instructions, which is clearly a fireable offense. You're now generalizing out to a vague concept of "sloppy code", which is not even quantifiable. In any case, the point is that low quality code shouldn't be promoted as the acceptable goal for AI.