4 ms·
"Requires"/"needed". LFS is about the muscle memory; the documentation; the cohesiveness. I always recommend it to people and consider it foundational to my u
by smitty1e 12d ago
"Requires"/"needed".
LFS is about the muscle memory; the documentation; the cohesiveness.
I always recommend it to people and consider it foundational to my understanding of How Stuff Works.
Whether that amounts to a hill of beans in the AI world remains to be seen.
- charcircuit 12d agoIt is more how stuff is compiled than how stuff works. Fundamental things like how processes are scheduled are not explained by LFS.
- gchamonlive 11d ago"works" is a loaded term. LFS is how the rubber meets the road, you want how the rubber is made, for that you need something like https://www.baeldung.com/linux/processes-guide https://www.baeldung.com/linux/processes-guide or https://linux-kernel-labs.github.io/refs/heads/master/lectures/processes.html https://linux-kernel-labs.github.io/refs/heads/master/lectur...
- newswasboring 11d agoAnd if you want to get to at least the bottom most visible turtle you go with something like NAND to Tetris https://www.nand2tetris.org/ https://www.nand2tetris.org/
- charcircuit 11d ago>LFS is how the rubber meets the road Again I disagree. Way too much time is spent building software than actual practical OS development.
- mid-kid 11d agoLFS is not OS development. You build a distribution by assembling all the components. If you want to develop an OS from scratch, perhaps you're looking for osdev.org.
- charcircuit 11d agoWhat is the point of making a distro, if not to make an OS? It's the same thing.
- gchamonlive 11d agoOne supports the other, they aren't laid in opposition, but they are different, well-defined disciplines
- smitty1e 11d agoOK: "How *nix tools functioned together in command-line days".