3 ms·

> How are people getting this "waste of time not to use AI" and "generates 99% of my code" level of code quality? They don't know what n+1 problem is and they

• jappgar 11d ago
  tbf many human devs I've worked with don't think about n+1 and similar issues and need constant reminders. overall software quality seems largely unchanged
  • unclebucknasty 11d ago
    >tbf many human devs I've worked with don't... OTOH, if someone insists on writing bad code—even after being advised otherwise—then they should expect to be out of a job. Doesn't seem like "terminated junior developer" is the level of quality we should be accepting or promoting for AI.
    • jappgar 10d ago
      that doesn't actually happen though. If you fired every dev with sloppy code you wouldn't be left with much.
      • unclebucknasty 10d ago
        You previously asserted that devs repeatedly ignored specific code quality instructions, which is clearly a fireable offense. You're now generalizing out to a vague concept of "sloppy code", which is not even quantifiable. In any case, the point is that low quality code shouldn't be promoted as the acceptable goal for AI.