2 ms·
An article named “This is how we do modern frequentist statistics” is an excerpt from a book called “Bayesian workflows” Where is the article explaining that?
by wodenokoto 20d ago
An article named “This is how we do modern frequentist statistics” is an excerpt from a book called “Bayesian workflows”
Where is the article explaining that?
Anyway, great article, thanks for sharing.
- spider-mario 18d agoFrom your description, I thought “wait, is this going to be Andrew Gelman?” It is. (For context: https://youtu.be/ZmbrsbYwRWw https://youtu.be/ZmbrsbYwRWw )
- 3abiton 18d agoWait a bayesian advocate using a frequentist approach and not having a fight over which branch is supreme. What's happening with the world. I guess all stats united against AI.
- Tomte 18d agoGelman (2018, and reiterated 2024): "Bayesians are frequentists." (https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2018/06/17/bayesians-are-frequentists/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2018/06/17/bayesians-...)
- beckford 18d agoAs mentioned in the sibling comments, Andrew Gelman has covered this elsewhere. In particular, Gelman et al have a "Model Checking" chapter in their Bayesian Data Analysis book https://sites.stat.columbia.edu/gelman/book/BDA3.pdf https://sites.stat.columbia.edu/gelman/book/BDA3.pdf . A popular intro Bayesian book Statistical Rethinking has a similar "Sampling from the Imaginary" chapter (https://civil.colorado.edu/~balajir/CVEN6833/bayes-resources/RM-StatRethink-Bayes.pdf https://civil.colorado.edu/~balajir/CVEN6833/bayes-resources...). Both books introduce the topic early (the latter book deals with it in the third chapter) if you are willing to do a bit of reading.