2 ms·

I was bummed when I came across this: https://github.com/trifectatechfoundation/sudo-rs/issues/1299 https://github.com/trifectatechfoundation/sudo-rs/issues/129

• werdl 2mo ago
  I don't understand - I thought sudo-rs was supposed to be a drop-in replacement? If it implements a subset of features how can this be the case?
  • collinfunk 2mo ago
    I don't think sudo-rs ever advertised itself as a drop in replacement. They seem pretty upfront that it isn't their goal. See this list: https://github.com/trifectatechfoundation/sudo-rs#differences-from-original-sudo https://github.com/trifectatechfoundation/sudo-rs#difference...
    • t0duf0du 2mo ago
      Its not that if they have advertised themselves as a drop-in replacement or not. What made me bummed that cannonical used it as drop-in replacement and it did break some of my installation scripts.
  • swiftcoder 2mo ago
    the uutils project bills themselves as a drop-in replacement for coreutils. sudo-rs does not bill itself as a drop-in replacement for sudo
• LelouBil 2mo ago
  Is it just me or does anyone else have the impression that the "chlampel" user only posts LLM-generated messages