5 ms·
I'm not sure how you know what she thought or how she interprets the privacy rules. If someone posts something as friends only and someone jacks the link to the
by spiantino 14y ago
I'm not sure how you know what she thought or how she interprets the privacy rules. If someone posts something as friends only and someone jacks the link to the image and posts it on twitter, publicly, it doesn't mean the poster doesn't know the privacy rules of Facebook. It means someone who could see the photo took it and made it public. In this case it's the poster who didn't realize it wasn't already public (again, understandably, though in error).
- rhizome 14y agoIt means someone who could see the photo took it and made it public. Ah, now I see why you continue your line of insistence here: the problem is that the person who publicized the photo wasn't supposed to be able to see it. The poster didn't know it would be seen by more people than just her friends.
- tedunangst 14y agoDisagree. The problem is someone who wasn't supposed to share the photo shared it. Allowing friends of friends to see tagged photos is one of the points of tagging. My friends don't want to see my pictures of you, they want to see your pictures of me. In either case, reposting it to twitter should be taboo (and copyright infringement!).
- rhizome 14y agoAllowing friends of friends to see tagged photos is one of the points of tagging Says who?
- tedunangst 14y agoMy friends don't want to see my pictures of you, they want to see your pictures of me.
- rhizome 14y agoYou already said that.
- tedunangst 14y agoI thought you missed it. That's what I use tagging for. Am I doing it wrong?