3 ms·
>but the alternatives are worse It's not that "alternatives are worse, it's that xmpp is a broken protocol, which doesn't include support for anything, even su
by aboardRat4 12d ago
>but the alternatives are worse
It's not that "alternatives are worse, it's that xmpp is a broken protocol, which doesn't include support for anything, even such a basic thing"
>There's a draft
LOOOOOOOOL
- ValdikSS 11d agoXMPP was not designed for human chat only, and XMPP foundation promotes it as an IoT communication protocol, like MQTT. Thanks to Daniel, the author of this post, we now have communication profiles which the IM-oriented servers and clients follow.
- aboardRat4 11d ago>XMPP foundation promotes it as an IoT communication protocol, like MQTT Which means that it will never work for human messaging, due to all the IoT cruft. >Thanks to Daniel, the author of this post, we now have communication profiles which the IM-oriented servers and clients follow. LOL, he only implemented p2p transfers when it bit himself in the tail on a plane flight. Conversations is the best of them all, but it doesn't mean that it is good.
- ValdikSS 11d agoI use XMPP almost exclusively for the last 10 years and don't see any major issues, not with the protocol, not with the clients. Everything is pretty reliable and works fine.
- aboardRat4 11d agoYeah, me too. Even my mom agrees to use it, because she loves me. But it's a "worksforme" fallacy.