3 ms·
> we direct them to build as much software as possible That's not a cure-all. Sometimes not writing software is the better choice.
by classified 12d ago
> we direct them to build as much software as possible
That's not a cure-all. Sometimes not writing software is the better choice.
- tomtomtom777 12d agoThis is exactly the problem we're ignoring. In the end, most software is a necessary evil. It solves a problem that shouldn't be there. In the end it's no different than healthcare or prisons. We don't need as much as possible. We need as little as possible. This automation isn't actually helping us.
- avereveard 11d agoA tool aggregation layer made of code is a good way to save tokens Composition is an issue only as long as one keep demanding tool calls in json. If tools are goal predicates in prolog, it's easier.
- stillpointlab 11d agoThat may or may not be true, but the calculus has changed with agents. A process that was better manual for a human org may not be better for an agent org. I think what is interesting here is that the industry is in this experimentation flux. Some people will choose to automate and write the software, others will not. And aggregate over the industry and over time we will learn. So just saying "sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't" isn't really adding value, compared to the people actually experimenting and sharing the results.