3 ms·
Lem's focus seems to be on being an "emacs" in and for Common Lisp. Lem throws away any attempts at compatibility with GNU Emacs. This is trying to be compati
by dismalaf 18d ago
Lem's focus seems to be on being an "emacs" in and for Common Lisp. Lem throws away any attempts at compatibility with GNU Emacs.
This is trying to be compatible with GNU Emacs.
- cmrdporcupine 18d ago> Lem throws away any attempts at compatibility with GNU Emacs. That depends on what you mean by compatibility. Keybindings and conventions and the like are basically the same. I'm not actually convinced at this point on the value of a lot of the extant elisp out there.
- dismalaf 18d ago> That depends on what you mean by compatibility. Emacs Lisp... > I'm not actually convinced at this point on the value of a lot of the extant elisp out there. I agree but lots of people probably don't.
- cmrdporcupine 18d agoIn a way sad to say it but these days if I'm missing some functionality I just ask a clanker to write it and it's done in a few minutes.