I would I have tried that. Presumably it either didn't look as good, or there was something about the bad-word checker that required me to run it server-side. M

I would I have tried that. Presumably it either didn't look as good, or there was something about the bad-word checker that required me to run it server-side. Maybe we didn't want a list of rude words sitting around in a .js file for anyone to look at. I don't recall, but whatever the reasons the imagemagick solution worked best for us.