3 ms·
>Even still, the demo proves that AVIF can deliver a usable image with up to 3x as fewer bytes as JXL! I was taught to be skeptical of objective benchmarks; Wh
by innocent_name 12d ago
>Even still, the demo proves that AVIF can deliver a usable image with up to 3x as fewer bytes as JXL!
I was taught to be skeptical of objective benchmarks; Why should we trust them when people are benchmaxxing?
https://habr.com/en/articles/700726/ https://habr.com/en/articles/700726/
- juliobbv 12d agoI'm not following.... the demo involves you look at images as they get decoded. Objective benchmarks are beside the point here.
- innocent_name 12d agoOh, i left the wrong quotation whereas i intended to reply to another message. Throughout the blogpost you're quality matching and comparing encoders based on objective metrics whereas it'd be more telling to get the crowd subjective comparisons. I think it's pretty evident that most codecs benchmaxx to the point of objective metrics being useless.
- juliobbv 12d agoAh, no worries! I can't speak for Iris and Aperture, but both "tune IQ" modes in SVT-AV1 and libaom had extensive human evaluations to make sure they weren't accidentally being benchmaxxed at the expense of subjective quality.