3 ms·
At this point I think if you want to keep talking you should just email me, because we're the only two people reading this. I don't understand either of your ar
by tptacek 18d ago
At this point I think if you want to keep talking you should just email me, because we're the only two people reading this. I don't understand either of your arguments here.
- teddyh 17d agoI don’t see why I should email you; you haven’t given any new arguments here in this thread, why should I expect any better by email? My arguments can be summarizes as follows: 1. The usage of DNSSEC is, contrary to your claim, going up, steadily. By number of domains signed, percentage of domains signed, and usage of DNSSEC-verifying resolvers. 2. Your argument seems to be that a) The increasing number and ratio of DNSSEC signed domains do not count, only big-name domains like Google are important (since many of those are still not DNSSEC signed), but b) big-name resolvers like Google are simultaneously not important, since those all do verify DNSSEC signatures. This argument is inconsistent. 3. Linking to, and trying to prove an argument by, your own biased graph using your own software, without disclosing that it is your graph and software, is scummy.