3 ms·
For tax evasion, not for anything related to SCOTUSblog, though being a writer for that blog may have gotten him additional scrutiny.
by fragmede 1mo ago
For tax evasion, not for anything related to SCOTUSblog, though being a writer for that blog may have gotten him additional scrutiny.
- mukmuk 1mo agoUpdated. Had been trying not to make it overlong. Specifically for tax evasion related to an addiction to playing poker with billionaires. > “He is not wealthy enough to sustain the losses of the billionaires he has played against, and he is not good enough at poker to win at the rate of professionals,” they wrote.