5 ms·
Yes, yes I did. My question is why it was selected in the first place, rather than a period of exploration of the benefits and drawbacks of the different NoSQL
by druiid 14y ago
Yes, yes I did. My question is why it was selected in the first place, rather than a period of exploration of the benefits and drawbacks of the different NoSQL solutions (which perhaps might have stopped this particular test-case from being a failure). The article doesn't mention those details though.
Also, we DO implement a two DB setup... Couchbase and MySQL. They both have their place.
- zenocon 14y agoI don't think you read it very carefully; the second sentence links to the earlier article where they list the reasons they chose that tech over others. > I wrote about what I was thinking at the time here [1] [1] http://codeascraft.etsy.com/2010/05/19/mongodb-at-etsy/ http://codeascraft.etsy.com/2010/05/19/mongodb-at-etsy/
- benatkin 14y agoThen you would know that they were doing this in 2010, before Couchbase.