2 ms·
This is the fallacy of inventing a hypocrite by combining individual opinions from multiple people. Not one single tech person I know in person has ever been "
by happytoexplain 12d ago
This is the fallacy of inventing a hypocrite by combining individual opinions from multiple people.
Not one single tech person I know in person has ever been "pro immigration" or "anti immigration". They all want reasonable immigration, and part of that has always meant not harming the livelihoods of existing citizens. That's the subjective part.
Edit: This is also a good example of the problem where we assume a person's opinion when they are not loud/explicit about a topic. E.g. a tech person might not have loud opinions on H1Bs, or they might loudly denounce e.g. Trump's immigrant detention centers, and you might falsely then slot that person into a blunt binary like "pro immigration". Then, when their lives are negatively affected by H1B policy, they speak against it, and you then think of them as a hypocrite even though they did nothing hypocritical.
- r_lee 12d agoI've seen the whole "nobody is illegal" be quite a popular sentiment in recent years and that (when talking about the US) that as long as they're ok people, they should be let in, seemingly oblivious to the incredibly strict US visa requirements for people from Europe etc. I'm sure this is at least partly a case of the loud minority, but it's hard to tell sometimes
- rbanffy 12d ago> oblivious to the incredibly strict US visa requirements for people from Europe etc. Their strange notions of what democracy looks like might feel dangerous to the current government.