3 ms·
That's stupid, these courts are stupid It should have nothing to do with storing copies it should have to do with what the models can produce. And it's clear t
by bluefirebrand 18d ago
That's stupid, these courts are stupid
It should have nothing to do with storing copies it should have to do with what the models can produce. And it's clear they can produce copyrighted works, they've just been tuned so they don't.
That shouldn't satisfy anyone.
- deleted 18d ago[deleted]
- immibis2 18d ago> they can produce copyrighted works, they've just been tuned so they don't. In other words... they can't. A different one can but this one can't. The court is not stupid, and will consider this fact.
- butlike 18d agoThey can't unless the tuner produces a copyrighted work for whatever their purpose would be, because they can step in and "detune" the thing at 3am for a competitive advantage.
- embedding-shape 18d agoThis assumes the "tuning" (I assume you mean fine-tuning?) is lossless, which it isn't.
- scottyah 18d agoYou can produce copyrighted works and have just been tuned not to lol. I fail to see how limiting an ability to comply with the law is any different from just complying with the law?
- bluefirebrand 18d agoProprietary Computer systems shouldn't get the same leeway that humans do. Simple as that.