2 ms·
That is like crediting a fan posting on Twitter "he should run it in for a touchdown instead of taking 3 points" instead of the coach who decided and implemente
by elif 21d ago
That is like crediting a fan posting on Twitter "he should run it in for a touchdown instead of taking 3 points" instead of the coach who decided and implemented a play which actually won the football game.
- vintermann 21d agoNot really, no, because if you have the right model (a book cipher) it seems it shouldn't be so hard to solve. Those Germans just didn't have time. That suggests to me that this was a fairly niche cipher, that hadn't got much attention from humans, certainly not nearly as much as more famous cryptograms (the zodiac killer's, kryptos, Elgar's, the Voynich manuscript etc.) In fact I had never heard of this cryptogram. I don't think this is all that demonstrative of AI power, more than what we already know from coding prowess. It is, however, a great counterexample to the often heard assertion that short cryptograms can't be decisively solved because they have too many possible solutions.
- elif 20d ago"those germans just didn't have time" That is a succinct explanation of the decoupling of human capacity for cognitive load with the expansion of global cognitive capacity made possible by AI agents. Just as the creation of bulldozers decoupled the capacity for human labor from the global capacity for digging.
- onesandofgrain 21d ago[flagged]
- slekker 20d agoWeak argument, with an absurd analogy trying to make your point.