3 ms·
Yes but the decode time is orders of magnitude more.
by jaffathecake 17d ago
Yes but the decode time is orders of magnitude more.
- PunchyHamster 17d agowho cares, you're not displaying 60 of them per second
- jaffathecake 17d agoIf the bandwidth saving gets you the image 10ms sooner, but due to the decoding time it takes 70ms longer to display, you're losing. And in the cached cache, the bandwidth saving is gone, and you're still paying the decoding penality.
- spider-mario 17d agoRight, so in that hypothetical scenario where your bandwidth is over ~40MB/s, the bandwidth saving isn’t so relevant. That sounds a bit tautological?
- jaffathecake 17d agoI'm not sure where you're getting those numbers from. But, in the cached case, the download time is very fast, yes.
- spider-mario 17d agoAnd you might want the cache to either take up less space or hold more images.