> then infect some immunosuppressed political prisoners and see who dies fastest. A virus that makes victims die the fastest is not, in fact, an effective biow

> then infect some immunosuppressed political prisoners and see who dies fastest. A virus that makes victims die the fastest is not, in fact, an effective bioweapon, because it won't spread much. And the "spreads by itself" part is what actually makes bioweapons worthwhile, if you have to manufacture it in bulk and dump it directly on all targets, you can just use a chemical weapon instead.