3 ms·
> I have a hunch this is not lost on you though, and you're doing this performatively. Uh, duh? I’m trying to draw a distinction that the person isn’t doing th
by nearlyepic 14d ago
> I have a hunch this is not lost on you though, and you're doing this performatively.
Uh, duh? I’m trying to draw a distinction that the person isn’t doing the work, the LLM is.
> On the contrary, it is a great way to induce animosity.
Sorry, what had you under the impression I was trying to make friends? When people who suck show up to your spot, you make them go away by making it clear they’re not welcome.
- fragmede 14d agoWhat if you're the one that sucks?
- nearlyepic 13d agoThen we can agree to disagree :)
- perching_aix 14d ago> Sorry, what had you under the impression I was trying to make friends? Why, are you here to make enemies instead? If not, and heaven forbid there's a space between the two, this should apply: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_principle Or do you really need to be explained the point of civility? > When people who suck show up to your spot, you make them go away by making it clear they’re not welcome. Except you were not making things clear. On the contrary, you were pretending that there was ambiguity in their words, which arguably only complicated things. This is a very cowardly and sly way to make any point. Mind you, for the unwelcome people, the downvote and flag buttons are the way to go. Comments are for conversation.
- nearlyepic 13d agoI’m not interested in being civil with people who actually believe using LLMs give you skills. The same way I’m not interested in being civil with homophobes and flat-earthers.
- perching_aix 13d ago[dead]