4 ms·

This is why I'm a huge fan of Spotify. I'm not going to buy music (in either CD/MP3 format) so I'm happy enough to pay the small fee to have access to a huge mu

by thejosh 14y ago

This is why I'm a huge fan of Spotify. I'm not going to buy music (in either CD/MP3 format) so I'm happy enough to pay the small fee to have access to a huge music library across all devices. They also have a Linux client that works perfectly for me which is also a huge bonus.

grogs 14y ago
It was only announced this month that spotify would add Metallica's back catalogue. They hardly have a complete library of music.
- lleims 14y ago
  They have a complete enough library for 90% of the Internet population.
gioele 14y ago
> I'm happy enough to pay the small fee to have access to a huge music library across all devices. As long as it lasts. I want my music collection to be accessible also when Spotify will go out of business, sued into oblivion or acquired and shut down.
- UnoriginalGuy 14y ago
  Why would they be sued? Last I heard Spotify was very much running a legal business.
  - Ygg2 14y ago
    Just because they are running a legal business now, doesn't mean they will run a legal business in future. Either they can change, or more likely laws will change, rendering them a vulnerable target for suing. Plus, I'm sure they are breaking some ridiculous patent somewhere anyway.
- cageface 14y ago
  Doesn't have to be one or the other. Pay Spotify $10/month to discover new music and then go buy lossless copies of the albums you really care about. Most records I could live without but those few special ones I have backed up in S3 in FLAC.
  - aes256 14y ago
    Notwithstanding something exceptionally rare, why the need to back up FLACs on S3? I back up my music collection locally, and I have double-redundancy of sorts (it's backed up to a RAID 5 array on a file server, so in theory it could withstand the failure of the original drive and one of the back up drives), but if worst comes to worst I could just acquire everything again. With a couple of exceptions they're just lossless copies of widely available music recordings...
    - justincormack 14y ago
      Are you suggesting backing them up on pirate music sites?
      - aes256 14y ago
        Not advocating copyright infringement, nor was I suggesting that in particular. That would be a viable back up strategy, though. Have a rare copy of a recording? Make it widely available, then if your copy is destroyed, the odds of you being able to acquire an identical copy again are much improved.
demallien 14y ago
Does Spotify have access to "entire album only" tracks?

by thejosh 14y ago

grogs 14y ago

It was only announced this month that spotify would add Metallica's back catalogue. They hardly have a complete library of music.

lleims 14y ago
They have a complete enough library for 90% of the Internet population.

gioele 14y ago

> I'm happy enough to pay the small fee to have access to a huge music library across all devices. As long as it lasts. I want my music collection to be accessible also when Spotify will go out of business, sued into oblivion or acquired and shut down.

UnoriginalGuy 14y ago
Why would they be sued? Last I heard Spotify was very much running a legal business.
- Ygg2 14y ago
  Just because they are running a legal business now, doesn't mean they will run a legal business in future. Either they can change, or more likely laws will change, rendering them a vulnerable target for suing. Plus, I'm sure they are breaking some ridiculous patent somewhere anyway.
cageface 14y ago
Doesn't have to be one or the other. Pay Spotify $10/month to discover new music and then go buy lossless copies of the albums you really care about. Most records I could live without but those few special ones I have backed up in S3 in FLAC.
- aes256 14y ago
  Notwithstanding something exceptionally rare, why the need to back up FLACs on S3? I back up my music collection locally, and I have double-redundancy of sorts (it's backed up to a RAID 5 array on a file server, so in theory it could withstand the failure of the original drive and one of the back up drives), but if worst comes to worst I could just acquire everything again. With a couple of exceptions they're just lossless copies of widely available music recordings...
  - justincormack 14y ago
    Are you suggesting backing them up on pirate music sites?
    - aes256 14y ago
      Not advocating copyright infringement, nor was I suggesting that in particular. That would be a viable back up strategy, though. Have a rare copy of a recording? Make it widely available, then if your copy is destroyed, the odds of you being able to acquire an identical copy again are much improved.

demallien 14y ago

Does Spotify have access to "entire album only" tracks?