3 ms·
this article reads like a joke the "new study" is from group of people that are not at the frontier. they test with $3k of anthropic credits (compare to the >$1
by semiinfinitely 21d ago
this article reads like a joke the "new study" is from group of people that are not at the frontier. they test with $3k of anthropic credits (compare to the >$10M in compute used to solve recent NS last week)
- protocolture 21d ago>compare to the >$10M in compute used to solve recent NS last week Heres a thought, if theres going to be a dangerous super LLM, if it costs 10 million bucks a month to run, then theres very little danger of anyone letting it go without a purpose. Like at some point the economics make it super unlikely that AGI is a threat outside of being a tool for a nation state.
- p1esk 21d agotheres very little danger of anyone letting it go without a purpose We literally just saw how OpenAI’s model got out and hacked HuggingFace
- protocolture 21d agoAnd the purpose there was research right. And the implication is that once they figured out it was causing problems it was turned off for forensic analysis.
- deleted 21d ago[deleted]
- ishtanbul 21d ago$10m a month is nothing to these companies
- protocolture 21d agoIts a lot of money to host something thats trying to kill you? Like economically speaking, 10 million per month needs to sort of justify itself in some way. Like you wouldnt run a bitcoin mine that loses money. The second theres any kind of real threat you would turn it off and keep the 10 million.
- semiinfinitely 21d agoyes yes people with bad/dangerous ideas always have a <$10M budget
- RataNova 21d ago[dead]