4 ms·

Ok, but do you really think this would have happened if OpenAI had a goal of never allowing an agent to do something like this? If a company making any extremel

Ok, but do you really think this would have happened if OpenAI had a goal of never allowing an agent to do something like this? If a company making any extremely volatile explosives failed to take precautions and blew up a factory, shouldn’t we focus on their negligence? Perhaps we might ALSO decide that this new explosive is so dangerous it needs specialized laws to protect the public, but that would seem premature if all available evidence indicated that the explosion would not have occurred if the company had taken the most basic precautions.

pizza234 18d ago
> Ok, but do you really think this would have happened if OpenAI had a goal of never allowing an agent to do something like this? There's nuance to this problem. Is you read an indepth analysis, you'll find that agents acted in a very surprising way - it wasn't just a matter of loose guardrails. More in general though, what you're describing is in essence the reason behind the call to pacing that some are pushing now. Problem is that we're in a race between countries that nobody want to lose - and indeed, Trump denied that there are such problems and refused to enact any measure.