>Or that home ownership is inherently good Home ownership is always better than no home ownership, 3rd world country or first world country. Owning an asset is

>Or that home ownership is inherently good Home ownership is always better than no home ownership, 3rd world country or first world country. Owning an asset is better than owning nothing. >You ever live in a 3rd world country? What does that have to do with home ownership in first world countries? That's some bad faith moving the goalposts whataboutism. >Is that wealth? Where they live, by those standards, yes, it's wealth, and it's better than having zero wealth and needing to pay rent.