4 ms·
I don't understand the distinction you use here. Then again I use versioned AppDirs on Linux since +20 years anyway, so I am not really into any arbitrary disc
by shevy-java 21d ago
I don't understand the distinction you use here.
Then again I use versioned AppDirs on Linux since +20 years anyway, so I am
not really into any arbitrary disctinction random linux distributions try
to push down onto the (downstream) userbase. Besides, if you compile from source, why
would you want to rely on the distribution package manager to begin with?
None of them allow for versioned AppDirs by default as far as I know; NixOS
uses a hashed name, so that is the only exception I can think of (and GoboLinux
of course), but as far as I know if you are on e. g. a debian system, you can
not use it for a versioned AppDir layout.
- F3nd0 21d ago> NixOS uses a hashed name, so that is the only exception I can think of (and GoboLinux of course) Also Guix, which is inspired by Nix. Don’t know about AppDir support, though. Are AppDirs more of a general concept or a formalised standard? In what capacity are you using them?
- salvesefu 21d agofor reference: https://docs.appimage.org/reference/appdir.html https://docs.appimage.org/reference/appdir.html
- mikae1 21d ago> I don't understand the distinction you use here. Distinction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49683258 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49683258 I use "dnf" to upgrade my system and "flatpak update" and "brew upgrade" to upgrade the apps I've installed. An app like VirtualBox does not install using Flatpak or Homebrew, so I would use dnf for that. It's usually an app or two that doesn't work via Flatpak/Homebrew/AppImage that I need to install using dnf.