4 ms·
This sounds more like some elitism. Who cares how your coworkers got there, the point is to have good history at the origin. People don't need to see your dirty
by omnimus 21d ago
This sounds more like some elitism. Who cares how your coworkers got there, the point is to have good history at the origin. People don't need to see your dirty laundy, there is nothing interesting about it.
- otherme123 21d ago> People don't need to see your dirty laundy, there is nothing interesting about it. We disagree here, thus we prefer different tools. Nothing elitist here. I have seen git people throwing away repos and start again just to hide mistakes/pivoting and look "pro" and "right from the start". Or worse, I have seen people botching repos to others rewritting history just to make them look clean. I embrace mistakes, and sometimes they become useful later to replay train of thoughs.
- specialist 21d agoAgreed. In teams, only the history of what is committed to shared repo is important.