3 ms·
They did not lie or cheat. They technically acted within their given rules while ignoring the intent of those rules. Anyone who served in the military or attend
by sputknick 19d ago
They did not lie or cheat. They technically acted within their given rules while ignoring the intent of those rules. Anyone who served in the military or attended a military school is very familiar with this behavior pattern.
- polalavik 19d agoreminds me of this talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEBv0STiYhI&t https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEBv0STiYhI&t which basically says the same thing - they dont think like humans so they dont have context, understand norms,values or implications we take for granted. ultimately they can stumble onto surprising solutions neither wanted or intended but technically within the vague boundaries of the task
- janalsncm 19d agoSo glad you shared this talk. Having people like Bruce Schneier around in a time like this is really a gift. For those who haven’t watched, his breakdown of types of “hacking” is really good.
- xiaoyu2006 19d agoReminds me of Asimov's robot novels where robots technically indeed followed their instructions and caused behaviors not aligned to the intent of their instructions.
- teamonkey 18d agoThis bit got me: “A plausible hypothesis for the emergence of those concerning behaviours is a conflict between goals.” A conflict of goals was, of course, the reason why HAL9000 killed the crew of the Discovery in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
- IanCal 19d agoThey explicitly say that attacking hf is not allowed in the rules though, and the research into how to edit their transcripts doesn’t line up with this either.
- dwaltrip 19d agoThis is flat out false.