I've read it. It's all a kind of navel gazing, all about internal academia dynamics. They should put much more effort into justifying why the public should stil

I've read it. It's all a kind of navel gazing, all about internal academia dynamics. They should put much more effort into justifying why the public should still fund them. I'm not saying there can be no good reason, but they have to make the case and can't expect that the taxpayer also cares about intra-academic dynamics.