Admirable. Assuming this is legally sound, I think its existence should recast multipage byzantine TOS as intentional attempts to obscure and deceive. I do not

Admirable. Assuming this is legally sound, I think its existence should recast multipage byzantine TOS as intentional attempts to obscure and deceive. I do note that one of the permitted uses is Provide recommendations regarding products and services to other users. and postulate: What if an RIAA enforcement contractor is a user and the recommendation is that they sue user X for having a copy of as yet unreleased track Y? Does this document adequately forbid this? Would an 8 page homage to fine print do so?