4 ms·

I asked some pretty straightforward questions about the specific legal issues involved— the gun case being an important point in our legal system’s handling of

I asked some pretty straightforward questions about the specific legal issues involved— the gun case being an important point in our legal system’s handling of negligence — and your answer basically translates into you not knowing. Negligence is not exclusively criminal in the US legal system, but the underlying concept of negligence is pretty consistent. If you’re not simply toeing the line for OpenAI and want to move beyond your vibes-based understanding of the legal concept, there’s a lot of info out there, including the full test, the reasonable person concept, and very relevant examples of how this worked in real trials. I’m not interested in debating whatever your personal take on negligence means here because it’s largely irrelevant.

scotty79 21d ago
> I asked some pretty straightforward questions about the specific legal issues involved Perhaps you should ask a lawyer from the country that the precise laws of interest you. I'm not one. I know only that there are no laws about AI containment yet and AIs are not guns. You could as well refer to what consists of negligence when it comes to backyard pools. I'm also not really interested in discussing particular laws of US because China will overtake it in few years and they have a better chance of directing international AI laws. So whatever US comes up with will remain local and increasingly irrelevant.
- DrewADesign 21d ago
  You’re not interested because you challenged my definition of negligence by inventing some glib pseudo technicality and then got flustered when I asked you to explain how it was rooted in the real world. Sometimes we get caught taking out of our asses. It happens. But I understand you’re just trying to save face so I’ll leave you here to finish that up yourself. Have a good one.
  - scotty79 21d ago
    No. Negligence is a concept in all human law systems. Its details vary. You are fixated on the particular one, of the law system that I respect almost the least of the entire world. So I'm not interested because I will never set foot in that country and deficiencies of its laws are a huge factor in that. I don't care about saving my face. I'm an idiot and an ignorant and I don't care. Stop projecting your lack of acceptance of your own limitations on me. Or don't.
    - DrewADesign 21d ago
      ::golf clap::

scotty79 21d ago

> I asked some pretty straightforward questions about the specific legal issues involved Perhaps you should ask a lawyer from the country that the precise laws of interest you. I'm not one. I know only that there are no laws about AI containment yet and AIs are not guns. You could as well refer to what consists of negligence when it comes to backyard pools. I'm also not really interested in discussing particular laws of US because China will overtake it in few years and they have a better chance of directing international AI laws. So whatever US comes up with will remain local and increasingly irrelevant.

DrewADesign 21d ago
You’re not interested because you challenged my definition of negligence by inventing some glib pseudo technicality and then got flustered when I asked you to explain how it was rooted in the real world. Sometimes we get caught taking out of our asses. It happens. But I understand you’re just trying to save face so I’ll leave you here to finish that up yourself. Have a good one.
- scotty79 21d ago
  No. Negligence is a concept in all human law systems. Its details vary. You are fixated on the particular one, of the law system that I respect almost the least of the entire world. So I'm not interested because I will never set foot in that country and deficiencies of its laws are a huge factor in that. I don't care about saving my face. I'm an idiot and an ignorant and I don't care. Stop projecting your lack of acceptance of your own limitations on me. Or don't.
  - DrewADesign 21d ago
    ::golf clap::