3 ms·

> OpenAI / Anthropic models have largely stopped advancing - that's not a good look when you're pre-IPO and Chinese models are catching up. This is obviously u

• simianwords 21d ago
  This line will keep repeating because it is necessary for the narrative: AI in general is just hype and unprofitable and all these companies are playing marketing tricks before the IPO after which they will cash out and let the economy crash. This is legit what a lot of people think. To continue this narrative, they have to keep up the charade of "things are not improving".
  • villish 21d ago
    Add in a heaping dash of anti-american sentiment, and you will get the truth behind the pessimistic commentary. Downplaying the latest models capabilities is frankly insane considering what we’ve seen what OpenAI’s models have done without safeguards. That wasn’t possible before this latest generation.
• glub 21d ago
  Anthropic could serve Opus 4.5 from a year ago under opus:latest and most heavy users would probably have no idea. Some of them would probably even prefer it. Yes, I do use them, quite heavily. The only difference at this point is in benchmarks that can't be trusted (see: artificial analysis on Astra), or in the way models communicate. Most gains are now from RL, which for some reason is hyperfocused on improving cyber capabilities, and harnesses. Raw intelligence gains of base models is absolutely slowing down.