2 ms·
I partly agree. I uses AI several times now, and to my experience its very fast and reasonable writing hundreds of DTOs/entities. They are withouit typos and cr
by vogje01 22d ago
I partly agree. I uses AI several times now, and to my experience its very fast and reasonable writing hundreds of DTOs/entities. They are withouit typos and created much faster then a human could it.
But if I ask him a question about architecture (for instance how to avoid race conditions, or how to implekmenet a role concept), the answers are a bit common sense. If I then tell him something like 'Wouldn't it be smarter when I do it this way?', it immediately agrees and does it 'this' way. So, my 5 cents: AI is good for routine work, but if it comes to intuition and experience, the human is still better.
- Vineetyadav2 22d agoyes Experience is something that is better than continuous training on same data A AI need training over 10000 times just be average at playing chess while humans need few hundred time because do teach things that continuous training can't