3 ms·

At this point I feel like AI companies selling Fear

13 points by Vineetyadav2 22d ago

AI can do reasoning better But It can't outsmart humans , AI gets trained on data but human have their learning with them ,only about 5% of data a human share as learning, knowledge - rest it just inside us ,So technically AI can't replace human , We do take inspiration , cross domain analysis and much diff things ,that a machine can't even do So I feel like These AI companies are just selling fear just to promote their product , what are your thoughts on this

foul 22d ago
That's such an outlandish idea! What made you suspect this? (sarcasm)
- Vineetyadav2 22d ago
  I do use AI but whenever I use it from third person view or diff POV ,it feels like very dumb to use
avaer 22d ago
Social media, prediction markets, politicians, stock markets are all clearly selling on hopes and fears. When you can't easily quantify and point to the benefits, that's the default and it works. Not to say the industries mentioned don't have legitimate purposes, but yes it's pretty obvious a large part of the AI industry has joined its peers in selling fear, though they would never admit that.
- Vineetyadav2 22d ago
  People are getting fomo of .com bubble they think just like .com bubble we need to build something in AI bubble to meet expectations
vogje01 22d ago
I partly agree. I uses AI several times now, and to my experience its very fast and reasonable writing hundreds of DTOs/entities. They are withouit typos and created much faster then a human could it. But if I ask him a question about architecture (for instance how to avoid race conditions, or how to implekmenet a role concept), the answers are a bit common sense. If I then tell him something like 'Wouldn't it be smarter when I do it this way?', it immediately agrees and does it 'this' way. So, my 5 cents: AI is good for routine work, but if it comes to intuition and experience, the human is still better.
- Vineetyadav2 22d ago
  yes Experience is something that is better than continuous training on same data A AI need training over 10000 times just be average at playing chess while humans need few hundred time because do teach things that continuous training can't

13 points by Vineetyadav2 22d ago

foul 22d ago

That's such an outlandish idea! What made you suspect this? (sarcasm)

Vineetyadav2 22d ago
I do use AI but whenever I use it from third person view or diff POV ,it feels like very dumb to use

avaer 22d ago

Social media, prediction markets, politicians, stock markets are all clearly selling on hopes and fears. When you can't easily quantify and point to the benefits, that's the default and it works. Not to say the industries mentioned don't have legitimate purposes, but yes it's pretty obvious a large part of the AI industry has joined its peers in selling fear, though they would never admit that.

Vineetyadav2 22d ago
People are getting fomo of .com bubble they think just like .com bubble we need to build something in AI bubble to meet expectations

vogje01 22d ago

I partly agree. I uses AI several times now, and to my experience its very fast and reasonable writing hundreds of DTOs/entities. They are withouit typos and created much faster then a human could it. But if I ask him a question about architecture (for instance how to avoid race conditions, or how to implekmenet a role concept), the answers are a bit common sense. If I then tell him something like 'Wouldn't it be smarter when I do it this way?', it immediately agrees and does it 'this' way. So, my 5 cents: AI is good for routine work, but if it comes to intuition and experience, the human is still better.

Vineetyadav2 22d ago
yes Experience is something that is better than continuous training on same data A AI need training over 10000 times just be average at playing chess while humans need few hundred time because do teach things that continuous training can't