3 ms·
> might want the option of using a build of grapheneos An OS without the core features and updates of GrapheneOS clearly isn't GrapheneOS. It's not permitted t
by grapheneos 1mo ago
> might want the option of using a build of grapheneos
An OS without the core features and updates of GrapheneOS clearly isn't GrapheneOS. It's not permitted to refer to it as such.
> That's kind of the whole point of FOSS, right?
No, the point of FOSS is that you can take all of our code and use it for other purposes. Calling an incomplete port to another device GrapheneOS is misleading users. It isn't GrapheneOS and must have a unique name.
- fc417fc802 1mo agoNo one was suggesting that your trademark should be infringed when marketing to users. If I do my own custom build of firefox referring to it as such in casual conversation is entirely separate from marketing it under that name for others to use (see ex icecat). Honestly while grapheneos is a useful thing that I'm glad exists you're being absolutely insufferable.
- Magicrafter13 1mo agoan objective statement of fact should not be considered "absolutely insufferable"
- fc417fc802 1mo agoAs always, context is all important.