4 ms·
By peers. Peer in peer-reviewed is a logical coherent and functional definition with answers. The logical issue with 'peers' is how to bootstrap it. At that b
by athrowaway3z 20d ago
By peers.
Peer in peer-reviewed is a logical coherent and functional definition with answers.
The logical issue with 'peers' is how to bootstrap it. At that bootstrap moment you can ask "by whom?". We are several centuries past that moment.
The cultural/social question you might ask today is "why (keep) them?".
At which point people will naturally ask you to make a strong case for "why not them?".
- thaumasiotes 20d ago> The logical issue with 'peers' is how to bootstrap it. At that bootstrap moment you can ask "by whom?". We are several centuries past that moment. Huh? We're about six decades past that moment.
- auggierose 20d ago> Peer in peer-reviewed is a logical coherent and functional definition with answers. What is the definition? If you tell me that, then I might be able to tell you if it is logical coherent and functional, I have a PhD in computational logic.
- wokwokwok 20d agoYour (many) replies on this topic are being down voted for a reason; please either post substantive comments or stop.
- auggierose 20d agoYes, for a reason, but not a reasonable reason, but the same reason you have for your comment: you just don’t know any better.
- da_chicken 20d agoAmongst all this rhetorical brush-beating, what were you trying to teach the snakes?
- raverbashing 20d ago> I have a PhD in computational logic. And you don't know how the peer-review system works? Just a hunch but Claude saying your work is "PhD level" does not count
- auggierose 20d agoI know that it doesn't work.
- athrowaway3z 20d agoSomething like this sketch work for you? peer(X, 0) :- founding_peer(X). electorate(T, count<Y>) :- peer(Y, T). support(X, T, count<Y>) :- candidate(X), peer(Y, T), recognizes(Y, X, T+1). peer(X, T+1) :- support(X, T, Votes), electorate(T, Total), 2 * Votes > Total.
- auggierose 20d agoStill waiting for a definition. People giving nonsense reviews is a feature of the peer review system though, yes.
- athrowaway3z 20d agoI want to ensure your PhD is actually from somebody who is acknowledged in the system of peers I bought into, before I want to risk wasting more of my time defining and explain while guessing at your ability to parse and understand them.
- auggierose 20d agoOr you could just give me a sensible definition.