4 ms·
Accepted by whom? Peer-reviewed by whom? I guess these little questions are what this article is really about.
by auggierose 22d ago
Accepted by whom? Peer-reviewed by whom?
I guess these little questions are what this article is really about.
- d0mine 22d ago> “The ultimate decision as to whether a publication qualifies as a “Qualifying Outlet” shall reside in the sole and unfettered discretion of CMI.”
- auggierose 22d ago[flagged]
- athrowaway3z 22d agoBy peers. Peer in peer-reviewed is a logical coherent and functional definition with answers. The logical issue with 'peers' is how to bootstrap it. At that bootstrap moment you can ask "by whom?". We are several centuries past that moment. The cultural/social question you might ask today is "why (keep) them?". At which point people will naturally ask you to make a strong case for "why not them?".
- thaumasiotes 22d ago> The logical issue with 'peers' is how to bootstrap it. At that bootstrap moment you can ask "by whom?". We are several centuries past that moment. Huh? We're about six decades past that moment.
- auggierose 22d ago> Peer in peer-reviewed is a logical coherent and functional definition with answers. What is the definition? If you tell me that, then I might be able to tell you if it is logical coherent and functional, I have a PhD in computational logic.
- wokwokwok 22d agoYour (many) replies on this topic are being down voted for a reason; please either post substantive comments or stop.
- auggierose 22d agoYes, for a reason, but not a reasonable reason, but the same reason you have for your comment: you just don’t know any better.
- da_chicken 22d agoAmongst all this rhetorical brush-beating, what were you trying to teach the snakes?
- raverbashing 22d ago> I have a PhD in computational logic. And you don't know how the peer-review system works? Just a hunch but Claude saying your work is "PhD level" does not count
- auggierose 21d agoI know that it doesn't work.
- athrowaway3z 22d agoSomething like this sketch work for you? peer(X, 0) :- founding_peer(X). electorate(T, count<Y>) :- peer(Y, T). support(X, T, count<Y>) :- candidate(X), peer(Y, T), recognizes(Y, X, T+1). peer(X, T+1) :- support(X, T, Votes), electorate(T, Total), 2 * Votes > Total.
- auggierose 21d agoStill waiting for a definition. People giving nonsense reviews is a feature of the peer review system though, yes.
- syncsynchalt 21d agoPresumably the organization giving away the million dollars is the arbiter of that question.