3 ms·
Not to be a party pooper but this is a paid service. I am sure there are reasons to pay but I bet their archive is the same as https://usenet.blueworldhosting.c
by imprint5 24d ago
Not to be a party pooper but this is a paid service. I am sure there are reasons to pay but I bet their archive is the same as https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com which is free. A free web frontend can be found at https://newsgrouper.org https://newsgrouper.org
- cstadler1869 24d agoIt has a free account has 25 full searches with advanced filtering etc.
- 1313ed01 23d agoDo those services have many more posts than what can be downloaded from archive.org and searched locally?
- zimpenfish 23d agoAlas, https://newsgrouper.org https://newsgrouper.org is not available from the UK (another casualty of the stupid OSA.)
- Animats 23d agoExpensive, too. $40/month.
- msephton 23d agoNewsgrouper is banned in UK for "safety concerns"
- cmacleod4 22d agoNewsgrouper is my site. It's not literally "banned", but after spending quite a bit of time studying the Online Safety Act and Ofcom's guidance, I concluded that it was just not practical to comply with its far-reaching requirements, and since I am in the UK I can't risk ignoring UK law.
- msephton 22d agoAh, the word used on the site is "Blocked" not "banned". Apologies. A shame that you decided to not support your own country. Imagine how much you could have done whilst explaining this issue!
- cmacleod4 22d agoI run newsgrouper.org as a hobby project. My architecture cannot support searching within article text, only by author, subject and/or date within one group at a time (or the set of groups you have subscribed to). Usenet-Rewind does support full-text search.