3 ms·
"relevant to our jobs"? Speak for yourself and your own job. Maybe you should just get a better job that lets you use your knowledge, unless you're not qualifi
by DonHopkins 21d ago
"relevant to our jobs"? Speak for yourself and your own job.
Maybe you should just get a better job that lets you use your knowledge, unless you're not qualified because you cheated your way through college and never actually learned that knowledge, which you're now trying to retroactivally justify by projecting your bad decisions and cheating onto everyone else.
You can't justify your own cheating by presuming and accusing everyone else of cheating. It's like saying "boys will be boys" because you acted that way too, instead of raising your boy not to be a misogynistic bully. You're just showing yourself to be a cheater, and limiting yourself to jobs for cheaters, of which there are many of course (especially c-level and MBA positions), luckily for you.
You should go back and take some spelling and grammar courses, because "use-fullness" is not a real word, and "must've took" is not correct grammar.
- threethirtytwo 21d ago[flagged]
- DonHopkins 21d ago[dead]
- threethirtytwo 19d agoWhy do I need to tell you something I don't know? What I said is still 100% true and applies to you regardless.
- DonHopkins 19d ago[flagged]