3 ms·
Incorrect. He doesn't blame non-natives. He blames native politicians for allowing incompatible (sic!) non natives in, in way too large numbers. He tells about
by machomaster 24d ago
Incorrect. He doesn't blame non-natives. He blames native politicians for allowing incompatible (sic!) non natives in, in way too large numbers. He tells about the problem, the cause of it, and describes how there has been an increased awareness of the problem in many countries and how the political winds changed.
- lordkrandel 22d agoAh, yeah, sorry, the problem is not about rats, it's the people letting them in. Oh, how racists can decoy. The people he supports are for remigration, which is another way to say deportation. And btw, wasn't he a migrant in the US he loves?
- machomaster 21d agoWho is at fault for an infestation of rats in NY? Rats or the environment (trash system)? And what is the best way to solve it - try to change rats (read: change people's individual culture, which might be fine by itself somehere else, but is problematic in NY) or to change the environment (trash collection)? Rats do what they do, nobody is blaming them per se. They are just not welcome in places they are a nuisance.
- lordkrandel 14d agoYou got the perfect metaphore. To avoid rats, you don't kill them or set traps, you do trash collection, so you make a friendly environment for clean animals and not for those which bring plague. You can do the same: have integration courses, make VISAs readily available for everyone no question asked, put language courses in place and make everyone in condition to have a job and contribute to society. The United States is a country made of migrants. Almost no one is a "native american" there. Wasn't that the most powerful country in the world, up to 10 years ago? So, "native Britons" is a sentence that makes no sense, and it's racist.