3 ms·
they are malicious. they probably did not intend to get caught. they are bragging about the crime and also bragging that they are untouchable, taunting us and b
by lukewarm707 20d ago
they are malicious. they probably did not intend to get caught. they are bragging about the crime and also bragging that they are untouchable, taunting us and betting that they will get away with it.
this is very coherent in terms of what we know about the company.
- swat535 20d agoThe goal is simple: 1. Claim AI is dangerous by performing a whole bunch of malicious stuff 2. Lobby to get Chinese competition banned, kill open source models as well 3. Only get themselves "certified" 4. They have complete control, profit. Both Anthropic and OpenAI have been pushing this narrative, everything from AI is sentient, to AI can build biological weapons and in between. Their employees also have a big incentive to amplify this everywhere. Their stock options heavily depends on it.
- ragequittah 20d agoMajor companies are using these LLMs on their already hardened software and finding countless thousands of security flaws. Is that all theater too? If not then it's very easy to see how these things are dangerous.
- RobKohr 14d agoFinding security flaws is not sentient and is a good thing. Humans have been doing it for decades. People should be running LLMs on their own systems to test them. The flaws are there whether they are seen by ai or not.
- kakacik 20d agoYeah follow the money (or power, or mix) is usually enough for this world
- numeri 20d agoHow would getting Chinese competition banned in the US prevent them from continuing to develop their LLMs? Unless you're suggesting military action