Why do you reject the idea or possibility of yes to military capability, but with ethics or restrictions? It seems obviously possible, and your arguments suppo

Why do you reject the idea or possibility of yes to military capability, but with ethics or restrictions? It seems obviously possible, and your arguments support it. Where is this tacit endorsement you see coming from? It seems like nobody thinks that way with respect to their employment or support. Anyways, this seems to be more about semantics than substance at this point, if you are arguing it is not binary, and I'm arguing that nobody said it was